Foundations & Philanthropic Partners

Strategies, tools, and innovative approaches that expand programmatic reach and strengthen philanthropic effectiveness

60

thematic areas of work

860

partner projects served

8X

years of experience

Overview

Philanthropic organizations are under growing pressure to ensure their investments deliver real, lasting change, in a moment where resources can feel scarce. Those investing  in gender equality outcomes directly often lack time and expertise to translate that commitment into achievable strategies, program design, and measurable outcomes.

But a gender lens matters just as much in initiatives where equality isn't the explicit goal: failing to account for gender differences risks missing entire populations and undermining results in every sector. Taking gender differences into consideration in what gets designed and how it is implemented is often the difference between programs that reach their targets and ones that don't. Without deep gender expertise embedded throughout the grantmaking cycle and strategic goal setting, even well-resourced initiatives can fall short of their potential.

Services We Provide

Strategy Development

Apply a gender equality lens to new and existing strategies.

Advisory & Capacity Building

Hands-on support at every stage of the grantmaking cycle.

Research & Evidence

Surface gaps and what actually moves the needle on gender equality.

Inclusive Leadership

Advance women’s leadership and examine your institution’s own culture.

Impact Storytelling & MEL

Design M&E frameworks that capture complex changes such as agency and empowerment, and translate evidence into compelling narratives.

Learn More

Download a PDF overview of our work, approach, and example outcomes for foundations and philanthropic partners.

Examples of our work in action

Addressing gender related barriers to immunization in DRC to improve polio vaccination coverage

Design, Analyze and Communicate: Working together to improve clinical study outcomes.

Reducing gender bias in household consumption data: Implications for food fortification policy